expert en médecine légale - significado y definición. Qué es expert en médecine légale
Diclib.com
Diccionario ChatGPT
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

Qué (quién) es expert en médecine légale - definición

1991 FILM BY ATOM EGOYAN
L' Expert en sinistres

Épuration légale         
  • [[Pétain]] meeting [[Hitler]] on 24 October 1940.
  • [[De Gaulle]] during World War II; he typically wore the uniform of a [[Brigade general]]
  • Divide and Conquer]]'' (1943)
FRENCH PURGE OF COLLABORATIONISTS
Epuration légale; Commission d'Épuration; Epuration legale; Court of Justice (France); Courts of Justice (France); Purge of collaborators in France; Post-Liberation purges in France
The épuration légale (French "legal purge") was the wave of official trials that followed the Liberation of France and the fall of the Vichy regime. The trials were largely conducted from 1944 to 1949, with subsequent legal action continuing for decades afterward.
expert testimony         
WITNESS WHO IS BELIEVED TO HAVE EXPERTISE AND SPECIALISED KNOWLEDGE IN A PARTICULAR SUBJECT BEYOND THAT OF THE AVERAGE PERSON
Expert witnesses; Expert source; Expert testimony; Expert Testimony; Scientific evidence (law); Expert Witness; Expert opinion; Expert evidence; Forensic witness; Forensic testimony; Professional witness; Judicial expert; Sociomedical assessment
n. opinions stated during trial or deposition (testimony under oath before trial) by a specialist qualified as an expert on a subject relevant to a lawsuit or a criminal case. See also: expert witness
expert witness         
WITNESS WHO IS BELIEVED TO HAVE EXPERTISE AND SPECIALISED KNOWLEDGE IN A PARTICULAR SUBJECT BEYOND THAT OF THE AVERAGE PERSON
Expert witnesses; Expert source; Expert testimony; Expert Testimony; Scientific evidence (law); Expert Witness; Expert opinion; Expert evidence; Forensic witness; Forensic testimony; Professional witness; Judicial expert; Sociomedical assessment
n. a person who is a specialist in a subject, often technical, who may present his/her expert opinion without having been a witness to any occurrence relating to the lawsuit or criminal case. It is an exception to the rule against giving an opinion in trial, provided that the expert is qualified by evidence of his/her expertise, training and special knowledge. If the expertise is challenged, the attorney for the party calling the "expert" must make a showing of the necessary background through questions in court, and the trial judge has discretion to qualify the witness or rule he/she is not an expert, or is an expert on limited subjects. Experts are usually paid handsomely for their services and may be asked by the opposition the amount they are receiving for their work on the case. In most jurisdictions, both sides must exchange the names and addresses of proposed experts to allow pre-trial depositions. See also: expert testimony

Wikipedia

The Adjuster

The Adjuster is a 1991 Canadian drama film directed by Atom Egoyan. It premiered at the New York Film Festival, and was invited to the Director's Fortnight program at the Cannes Film Festival. It is Egoyan's fourth feature film, and the first of his works to achieve international acclaim. The film has won five awards, as well as two other nominations upon its initial release. Egoyan based the film on a true story in 1989, when a fire burned down his parents' home. He realized how strange it could be for victims of a house fire to be emotionally dependent on insurance workers, which led to the inspiration for the project.

Egoyan promoted a book named after the same title as his film, The Adjuster, at a launch in Ottawa. It is a film analysis written by Tom McSorley, a head of the Canadian Film Institute. This book is part of an examination of Canadian cinema, in a series for the University of Toronto Press. The author goes into intricate depth about The Adjuster as he traces the genesis, production, and reception of the film. McSorley claims that it is a watershed film.